References
Atreja, Shubham, Joshua Ashkinaze, Lingyao Li, Julia Mendelsohn, and
Libby Hemphill. 2025. “What’s in a Prompt?: A Large-Scale
Experiment to Assess the Impact of Prompt Design on the Compliance and
Accuracy of LLM-Generated Text Annotations.”
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social
Media 19 (1): 122–45. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35807.
Blei, David M, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. “Latent
Dirichlet Allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning
Research 3: 993–1022.
Caliskan, Aylin, Joanna J Bryson, and Arvind Narayanan. 2017.
“Semantics Derived Automatically from Language Corpora Contain
Human-Like Biases.” Science 356 (6334): 183–86. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4230.
Chang, Jonathan, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Sean Gerrish, Chong Wang, and David
M. Blei. 2009. “Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic
Models.” Advances in Neural Information Processing
Systems 22: 288–96.
Deerwester, Scott, Susan T. Dumais, George W. Furnas, Thomas K.
Landauer, and Richard Harshman. 1990. “Indexing by Latent Semantic
Analysis.” Journal of the American Society for Information
Science 41 (6): 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9.
Denny, Matthew J, and Arthur Spirling. 2018. “Text Preprocessing
for Unsupervised Learning: Why It Matters, When It Misleads, and What to
Do about It.” Political Analysis 26 (2): 168–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.44.
Firth, John R. 1957. “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory,
1930–1955.” In Studies in Linguistic Analysis.
Blackwell.
Grimmer, Justin, Margaret E Roberts, and Brandon M Stewart. 2022.
Text as Data: A New Framework for Machine Learning and the Social
Sciences. Princeton University Press.
Grootendorst, Maarten. 2022. BERTopic: Neural Topic
Modeling with a Class-Based TF-IDF Procedure. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.05794.
Hickman, Louis, Stuti Thapa, Louis Tay, Mengyang Cao, and Padmini
Srinivasan. 2022. “Text Preprocessing for Text Mining in
Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations.”
Organizational Research Methods 25 (1): 114–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120971683.
Hu, Minqing, and Bing Liu. 2004. “Mining and Summarizing Customer
Reviews.” Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International
Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (New York, NY,
USA), 168–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/1014052.1014073.
Jacobi, Carina, Wouter Van Atteveldt, and Kasper Welbers. 2016.
“Quantitative Analysis of Large Amounts of Journalistic Texts
Using Topic Modelling.” Digital Journalism 4 (1):
89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1093271.
Jaroslawicz, Daniel, Brendan Whiting, Parth Shah, and Karime Maamari.
2025. How Many Instructions Can LLMs Follow at
Once? https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.11538.
Jegham, Nidhal, Marwan Abdelatti, Chan Young Koh, Lassad Elmoubarki, and
Abdeltawab Hendawi. 2025. How Hungry Is AI?
Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM
Inference. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.09598.
Kozlowski, Austin C, Matt Taddy, and James A Evans. 2019. “The
Geometry of Culture: Analyzing the Meanings of Class Through Word
Embeddings.” American Sociological Review 84 (5):
905–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419877135.
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2018. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its
Methodology. 4th ed. SAGE.
Laurer, Moritz, Wouter van Atteveldt, Andreu Casas, and Kasper Welbers.
2024. “Less Annotating, More Classifying: Addressing the Data
Scarcity Issue of Supervised Machine Learning with Deep Transfer
Learning and BERT-NLI.” Political Analysis
32 (1): 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2023.20.
Lehmann, Pola, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, and Annika
Werner. 2015. Manifesto Corpus. Version: 20150708174629. WZB
Berlin Social Science Center.
Lehmann, Pola, and Malisa Zobel. 2018a. Parties’ Immigration and
Integration Positions Dataset (PImPo): Version 2018.
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.pimpo.2018.
Lehmann, Pola, and Malisa Zobel. 2018b. “Positions and Saliency of
Immigration in Party Manifestos: A Novel Dataset Using Crowd
Coding.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (4):
1056–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12266.
Liu, Nelson F., Kevin Lin, John Hewitt, et al. 2024. “Lost in the
Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts.” Transactions
of the Association for Computational Linguistics 12: 157–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00638.
Monroe, Burt L., Michael P. Colaresi, and Kevin M. Quinn. 2008.
“Fightin’ Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for
Identifying the Content of Political Conflict.” Political
Analysis 16 (4): 372–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpn018.
Palicki, Sean, Stefanie Walter, Wouter Van Atteveldt, Alice Beazer, and
Isaac Bravo. 2023. “Selecting Relevant Documents for Multilingual
Content Analysis: An Evaluation of Keyword and Semantic Similarity
Search Approaches.” Computational Communication Research
5 (2): 1. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2023.2.5.PALI.
Roberts, Margaret E, Brandon M Stewart, Dustin Tingley, et al. 2014.
“Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.”
American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1064–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103.
Sprague, Zayne, Fangcong Yin, Juan Diego Rodriguez, et al. 2025.
“To CoT or Not to CoT? Chain-of-Thought
Helps Mainly on Math and Symbolic Reasoning.” International
Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.12183.
Törnberg, Petter. 2025. “Large Language Models Outperform Expert
Coders and Supervised Classifiers at Annotating Political Social Media
Messages.” Social Science Computer Review 43 (6):
1181–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393241286471.
Turpin, Miles, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2023.
“Language Models Don’t Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful
Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting.” Advances in
Neural Information Processing Systems 36. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.04388.
Vallejo Vera, Sebastián, and Hunter Driggers. 2025.
“LLMs as Annotators: The Effect of Party Cues on
Labelling Decisions by Large Language Models.” Humanities and
Social Sciences Communications 12 (1): 1530. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05834-4.
Van Atteveldt, Wouter, Mariken A. C. G. van der Velden, and Mark Boukes.
2021. “The Validity of Sentiment Analysis: Comparing Manual
Annotation, Crowd-Coding, Dictionary Approaches, and Machine Learning
Algorithms.” Communication Methods and Measures 15 (2):
121–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1869198.
Zheng, Mingqian, Jiaxin Pei, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Moontae Lee, and
David Jurgens. 2024. “When ‘a Helpful Assistant’ Is
Not Really Helpful: Personas in System Prompts Do Not Improve
Performances of Large Language Models.” Findings of the
Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 (Miami,
Florida, USA), 15126–54. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.888.